Currently the interface for editing messages is limited to a
command-line API tool; it's great for testing with e.g.:
./api/examples/edit-message --message=348135 --content="test $(date +%s)" --site=http://localhost:9991 --subject="test"
The next commit will add a user interface for actually doing the editing.
(imported from commit bdd408cec2946f31c2292e44f724f96ed5938791)
feedback-bot needs to be updated and restarted after this is pushed to
prod for these changes to take effect.
(imported from commit fcabd2f4bb26c794454e096242a8073805fc786c)
This post-commit hook depends on pysvn. After a transaction is completed,
a Humbug is sent to a configurable stream with the repo modified, actor,
and commit message.
(imported from commit 75cab82d5fe993ea7c4c05be07a7b61e770aff81)
Now that we're distributing these examples, we shouldn't be promoting
the use of the "--site" option.
(imported from commit 01ded4a851dc799fa6c7e902e937c4331ed92bf8)
The previous version of our code only worked with python-requests <
1.0 (as is the case on our servers), the new version will work with
any python-requests new enough to have a .json at all.
(imported from commit 77ffe3e0d890fe88776c313e0e3289aee1bb30ea)
Previously we sent it always as "data", which caused problems for GET
requests where there is no request body.
(imported from commit 20084d1da1b8228cc484536ca4d6f77f547a9d78)
We also switch the Python client to use a client string of "API: Python"
to allow us to determine more easily which bindings our users are using.
(imported from commit 7216c3d150b371835f14d1bc8d81979a92e44925)
After this commit, we built an API tarball and sent it to
CUSTOMER4, and then promptly reverted the commit so that
we could continue as we had been before.
(imported from commit 662519a79edd508e7c115b451a7ec6fbdf1fc0a4)
To incorporate the site parsing fix from a couple weeks ago.
Before deploying this to prod we need to run build-api-tarball and
deploy the code to humbughq.com as for usual API releases.
(imported from commit f6711f5cc07d174c30866029032a595ecee785a3)
We leave the stuff under api/ alone for now, since we need to be able to ship
it as a standalone thing.
tools/post-receive wasn't using the function anyway.
For push to master: Push this commit, update post-receive per instructions at
the top of that file, then push the rest of the branch to confirm that the hook
still works.
No manual instructions for prod.
(imported from commit 9bcbe14c08d15eda47d82f0b702bad33e217a074)
At Ksplice we used /usr/bin/python because we shipped dependencies as Debian /
Red Hat packages, which would be installed against the system Python. We were
also very careful to use only Python 2.3 features so that even old system
Python would still work.
None of that is true at Humbug. We expect users to install dependencies
themselves, so it's more likely that the Python in $PATH is correct. On OS X
in particular, it's common to have five broken Python installs and there's no
expectation that /usr/bin/python is the right one.
The files which aren't marked executable are not interesting to run as scripts,
so we just remove the line there. (In general it's common to have libraries
that can also be executed, to run test cases or whatever, but that's not the
case here.)
(imported from commit 437d4aee2c6e66601ad3334eefd50749cce2eca6)
